Chicago Police Department (CPD) Practice Exam 2026 - Free CPD Practice Questions and Study Guide

In Terry vs. Ohio, the principle established is that police officers are permitted to stop and briefly detain a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the individual is involved in criminal activity. This case introduced the idea that, during these stops, officers may conduct a limited search, known as a "frisk," for weapons if they have a reasonable belief that the person is armed and poses a threat to their safety. This ruling recognizes the need for officers to ensure their safety while also balancing the individual's rights.

Consequently, the other options do not accurately reflect the significance of this case. For instance, the right to search a vehicle generally requires probable cause and is not unrestricted. Likewise, while consent is a valid means for a search, the ruling in Terry vs. Ohio specifically addresses the condition of reasonable suspicion rather than relying solely on consent. Lastly, while searches typically require warrants, the case established exceptions in certain circumstances where officers can act on reasonable suspicion, making the blanket statement about the legality of warrantless searches misleading.